Dan Brickley, a developer advocate at Google who managed Schema.org, had a extremely nice line that I wished to amplify right here. He was requested by a seasoned search engine optimisation about which schema one ought to use in a particular case. Through which Dan Brickley replied “that query is a bit like asking a dictionary maintainer what to say.”
He goes on to elucidate that it’s “finest to place most effort into documented tangible advantages, which for Google are largely documented in.” He then linked to Google’s structured data gallery to supply examples.
The factor is, the one that requested is tremendous seasoned on schema/structured information and the like – he’s no beginner. So I believe perhaps the query was misinterpreted or misunderstood. However the response, however was fairly traditional and I wished to doc it.
Listed below are these tweets:
That query is a bit like asking a dictionary maintainer what to say. It is best to place most effort into documented tangible advantages, which for Google are largely documented in https://t.co/19uUaWG02k
— Dan Brickley (@danbri) April 28, 2021
Click on by means of to see the forwards and backwards dialog on Twitter.
Discussion board dialogue at Twitter.
I am questioning if we should always make the dictionary metaphor extra distinguished. It might assist clarify the totally different sorts of validation too – e.g. checking JSON-LD for having a ‘,’ in flawed place, vs checking should you’re information’s in the proper form to be eligible for some platform’s options.
— Dan Brickley (@danbri) April 30, 2021